NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Firns v Tzovaras [2006] NSWSC 925
HEARING DATE(S) : 1 September 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 11 September 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division Professional Negligence List
JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J
DECISION : Discovery ordered as in para [48]. Orders as sought in para 2 of the notice of motion. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the notice of motion.
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, Pt 21, r 21 Evidence Act, ss 118, 122
Chen v City Convenience Leasing Pty Limited [2005] NSWCA 297 Commonwealth of Australia v Northern Land Council (1991) 103 ALR 267 Idoport Pty Limited v National Bank (3) [1999] NSWSC 1026 CASES CITED : Jones v Monte Video Gasco (1880) 5 QBD 556 Lakatoi Universal Pty Limited v Walker (unreported, Rolfe J, 31 July 1998) Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341 Proctor & Gamble Australia Pty Limited v Medical Research Pty Limited [2001] NSWSC 183 Telstra Corporation Limited v BT Australasia Pty Limited (1998) 85 FCR 152
PARTIES : Charles Magnus Firns (Plaintiff) Ted Dorotheos Tzovaras (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20114/02
COUNSEL : C. Locke (Plaintiff) M. Dicker (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Oliveri Attorneys (Plaintiff) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LIST
STUDDERT J
Monday 11 September 2006
20114/02 CHARLES MAGNUS FIRNS v TED DOROTHEOS TZOVARAS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate