NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Stankovic [2006] NSWCCA 229
HEARING DATE(S): 19 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Grove J at 2; Hidden J at 49
DECISION: CROWN APPEAL ALLOWED; RESPONDENT RESENTENCED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - LARGE COMMERCIAL QUANTITY MDMA - OFFENDER ENGAGED AS "LABOURER" IN ILLICIT FACTORY - UNSUPERVISED - CLAIM OF DURESS ACCEPTED BY SENTENCING JUDGE - SEPARATE PREVIOUS ACTIVITY IN GROWING CANNABIS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT ON FORM 1 WITH OTHER OFFENCES - CROWN APPEAL - MANIFEST INADEQUACY DEMONSTRATED
AG's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999; No 1 of 2000 2002 56 NSWLR 146 Des Rosiers v R [2006] NSWCCA 6 Power v The Queen 1974 131 CLR 623 CASES CITED: R v Hampton 1998 44 NSWLR 729 R v Simpson 2001 53 NSWLR 704 R v Way 2004 60 NSWLR 168 The Queen v Olbrich 1999 199 CLR 270
PARTIES: Regina v Nenad Stankovic
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/407
COUNSEL: D. Frearson SC (Crown/Appellant) P. Hamill SC (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh (DPP) K. Kyriacou (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/11/1023
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Geraghty DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 15 December 2005
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: N/A
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/407
GILES JA GROVE J HIDDEN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate