NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Baroudi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 48 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 31 January 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 February 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1; Howie J at 2; Price J at 3;
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentencing - Crown concession on non-parole period - procedural fairness - armed robbery - relevance of guideline judgment - calculation of composite discounts - special circumstances - double counting - totality of sentences
Crimes Act 1900 s 86(2)(a), s 97 (1), 97 (2) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 43( 2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(3)
Ahmad v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 177 Parker v DPP (1992) 28 NSWLR 282 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Capar (2002) 136 A Crim R 564 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Knight (2005) 155 A Crim R 252 R v Lee [2000] NSWCCA 392 R v Lynn [2004] NSWCCA 222 R v Mako [2004] NSWCCA 90 R v Pham [2006] NSWCCA 288 CASES CITED: R v "S" (2000) 111 A Crim R 225 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Waqa (No 2) [2005] NSWCCA 33 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 219 Regina v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19 The Queen v Watson Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate