NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dr Andrew Roberts-Szudzinski Pty Ltd v .au Domain Administration Ltd [2006] NSWSC 950
HEARING DATE(S) : 24/08/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 September 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Statutory demand set aside. Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - application to set aside - whether genuine dispute as to existence of debt - CORPORATIONS - authority of officers - secretary of company conducting medical practice - whether ostensible authority to purchase 325 internet domain names - things "customarily" done by secretary of "similar company"
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss.128(1), 129(2), 459G, s.459H(1)(a)
Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 George Whitechurch Ltd v Cavanagh [1902] AC 117 CASES CITED : Minlabs Pty Ltd v Assaycorp Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 509 Panorama Developments (Guildford) Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd [1971] 2 QB 711 Royal British Bank v Turquand (1856) 6 E & B 327 Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd (1997) 76 FCR 452
PARTIES : Dr Andrew Roberts-Szudzinski Pty Limited - Plaintiff .au Domain Administration Limited - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1613/06
COUNSEL : Mr B.J. Skinner - Plaintiff Mr A.P.P. Lo Surdo - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Gells Lawyers - Plaintiff Maddocks Lawyers - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate