NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: MACDONALD v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS COMMISSION [2007] NSWCA 304
HEARING DATE(S): 19 October 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 October 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Mason P at 34; Giles JA at 77
DECISION: Appeal allowed in part
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE – Supreme Court procedure – New South Wales – procedure under Rules of court – pleadings – functions of pleadings – Defence – requirement to file a defence – requirement to raise statutory and/or positive defence – requirement to make positive assertions of fact and provide particulars – whether requirements can be dispensing with under the privilege against self-incrimination – privilege against self-exposure to a penalty – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r14.14, r15.1
Civil Procedure Act 2005 Corporations Law, s1317E LEGISLATION CITED: Customs Act 1901 (Cth), s247 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 J D Heydon, Cross on Evidence 6th Aust ed
A & L Silvestri Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2005] FCA 1658, 226 ALR 247 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v FFE Building Services Ltd [2003] FCAFC 132; (2003) 130 FCR 37 Banque Commerciale SA en Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 Bridal Fashions Pty Ltd v Comptroller-General of Customs (1996) 135 FLR 100, (1997) 17 WAR 499 CEO of Customs v Camile Trading Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1256, 58 ATR 163 CEO of Customs v Evenfont Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 431 Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477 CASES CITED: Hadgkiss v CFMEU [2005] FCA 1453, 146 IR 106 In the Matter of Water Wheel Mills Pty Ltd , Victorian Supreme Court, unreported 22 June 2001 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 Rank Film Ltd v Video Information Centre [1982] AC 380 Re New World Alliance Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed); Syncotex Pty Ltd v Baseler (1993) 47 FCR 90 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1 Rich v Australian Securities and Investment Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129 Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation v Westinghouse Electric Corporation [1978] AC 547 Sorby v The Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 Williams v Florida 399 US 78 (1970)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate