NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Hamze v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 36
HEARING DATE(S): 3 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Grove J at 62; Hoeben J at 63
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Appeal against sentence - whether elements of offence taken into account as aggravating factors - s21A of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - robbery - actual or threatened use of violence as elements of offence - threatened or actual use of violence as elements of offence - commission in company as element of offewnce - whether facts justified aggravating factor of disregard for public safety - whether offences in Form 1 could be taken into account as aggravating factor of series of offences - error found in some respects - but no less severe sentence warranted in law.
Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; R v Baxter [2005]NSWCCA 234; R v Blair [2005] NSWCCA 78; R v Farrer (1983) 78 FLR 10; R v Foster (1995) 78 A Crim R 517; R v Ibrahimi [2005] NSWCCA 153; R v Kelly [2005] NSWCCA 280; CASES CITED: R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 288; R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76; R v Salieb [2005] NSWCCA 85; R v Smith and Desmond (1965) AC 960; R v Street [2005] NSWCCA 139; R v Suaali [2005] NSWCA 206; R v Tadrosse [2005] NSWCCA 145; R v Way [2004] NSWLR 168; R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193.
PARTIES: Wesam Hamze v Regina
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate