NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 160 A Crim R 195
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Vickers v R [2006] NSWCCA 60
HEARING DATE(S): 23 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Simpson J at 20; Hall J at 117
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: appeal against conviction - maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm - assault occasioning actual bodily harm - admission of evidence over objection - statement tendered at trial pursuant to s65(2)(b) and (c) of Evidence Act 1995 - maker of statement unavailable to give evidence - objection taken on grounds of late notice and discretionary factors - no separate objection to content of evidence - whole of statement admitted - whether trial judge erred in admitting statement - - whether trial judge failed adequately to warn jury of the danger of relying on the evidence of the statement - directions to jury adequate to draw attention to any potential unreliability of statement, including those parts now held to have been inadmissible - hearsay provisions of the Evidence Act - exceptions to the hearsay rule - identification of previous representation - identification of what fact was intended to be asserted by previous representation - relevant evidence - evidence of out of court representation by one person cannot be given by out of court representation of another person - evidence of previous representations inadmissible - effect of admission of inadmissible evidence of previous representation - Criminal Appeal Rules, rule 4 - whether appellant requires leave before being permitted to argue admissibility of previous representations as a ground of appeal - Criminal Procedure Act s68, s289 - appellant waived right to committal hearing - proviso to s6 of the Criminal Appeal Act - admission of the inadmissible evidence would and should have had no significance in verdict - evidence properly admitted proves beyond reasonable doubt guilt of the offence
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate