NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Tekely v R; Nagle v R [2007] NSWCCA 75
HEARING DATE(S): 16 February 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 March 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Sully J at 2; Howie J at 128
DECISION: In the appeal of Alan John Tekely: (1) Appeal against conviction dismissed (2) Leave granted to appeal against sentence (3) Appeal against sentence dismissed; In the appeal of Craig Michael Nagle: Appeal against conviction dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW)
M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 R v Ita (2003) 139 A Crim R 340 CASES CITED: Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300 R v Forbes [2005] NSWCCA 377 Reg v Bolt (2001) 126 A Crim R 284 R v Moussa [2001] NSWCCA 427; 125 A Crim R 505
Alan John Tekely PARTIES: Craig Michael Nagle Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/2499; 2007/144
D. Arnott SC - Crown COUNSEL: P. Doyle - Tekely A. Haesler SC - Nagle
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh - Crown Marks Kleef & Assoc. - Nagle
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/11/1505
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hock DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 2 June 2006
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/2499 2007/144
McCLELLAN CJ at CL SULLY J HOWIE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate