NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Chapman v Chapman [2007] NSWSC 1109
HEARING DATE(S) : 19 September 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 October 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Expert Evidence List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
DECISION : Leave refused to adduce expert evidence
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – expert evidence – expert evidence list – where expert evidence not reasonably required to resolve issues in the proceedings
(CTH) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, s 109N(1) LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 31 Div 2, by rr 31.17, 31.19
Gwenneth Irene Driver Chapman (plaintiff) PARTIES : Murray Philip Chapman (first defendant) Andrew Towse Chapman (second defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2952/07
COUNSEL : Ms J Needham SC (plaintiff) Mr M Willmott SC (defendants)
SOLICITORS : Wills & Estates Legal Service (plaintiff) RA Davies (defendants)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EXPERT EVIDENCE LIST
BRERETON J
Tuesday, 2 October 2007
2952/07 Gwenneth Irene Driver Chapman v Murray Philip Chapman & Anor JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: The plaintiff Gwenneth Irene Driver Chapman is the widow of the late Maxwell James Chapman, and the defendants are the executors of the deceased's Will, cl 6(b) of which provides: I give and bequeath the shares held by me in the company Gwill Pty Ltd which owns an interest in a caravan park development at Karuah in the State of New South Wales to my trustee upon the following trusts: …
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate