NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Kaifoto aka Teaupa v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 186
HEARING DATE(S): 13 December 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; James J at 112; Simpson J at 114
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed; Appeal against sentence allowed in part
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SEPARATE TRIAL ON TWO INDICTMENTS RELATING TO DIFFERENT VICTIMS - RELATIONSHIP EVIDENCE ADMITTED - NO BREACH OF REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING TENDENCY OR COINCIDENCE EVIDENCE - DELAY IN PROSECUTION - COMPLAINT OF MATTERS IN ADDRESS BY CROWN PROSECUTOR - REMEDY AVAILABLE AT TRIAL - ADEQUACY OF DIRECTIONS - SENTENCE - APPEAL ALLOWED TO VARY SENTENCING ORDERS TO ACHIEVE INTENTION STATED BY SENTENCING JUDGE
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
Longman v The Queen 1989 168 CLR 79 R v Atroushi [2001] NSWCCA 406 R v Beserick 1993 30 NSWLR 510 CASES CITED: R v Garner 1963 81 WN (NSW) 120 R v Hookey [2004] NSWCCA 223 R v Murray 1987 11 NSWLR 12 R v Preston, unrep NSWCCA 9 April 1997 R v Simpson 2001 53 NSWLR 704
PARTIES: Paea Teaupu Kaifoto aka John Teaupa v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1341
COUNSEL: A. Francis (Applicant) N. Noman (Crown/Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S. O'Connor (Applicant) S. Kavanagh (DPP)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/11/1072
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Dodd DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 2 July 2004
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: N/A
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/1341
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate