NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2007] NSWSC 112
HEARING DATE(S) : 15/02/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 February 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Orders for issue of examination summonses. Direction that liquidator justified in conducting examinations.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - special purpose liquidator appointed by court - application for issue of examination summonses - whether relevant criteria satisfied - application for direction that pursuit of examinations justified
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Part 5.9, ss.596A, 596B, 596C Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999, rule 11.3(4)
Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1434 Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1447 CASES CITED : Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2007] NSWSC 69 Re Ansett Australia Ltd (2002) 115 FCR 409 Sanderson v Classic Car Insurances Pty Ltd (1985) 10 ACLR 115 Sent v Andrews (2002) 6 VR 317
Onefone Australia Pty Limited - First Plaintiff DCA Resources Australia Pty Limited - Second Plaintiff Pacific Finance Group Pty Limited - Third Plaintiff PARTIES : Talent2 Works Pty Ltd - Fourth Plaintiff One.Tel Limited - First Defendant Steven Sherman - Second Defendant Peter Walker - Third Defendant Paul Gerard Walker - Special Purpose Liquidator
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5291/03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate