NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 178 A Crim R 1
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: GAC v Regina, WC v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 287
HEARING DATE(S): 27 July 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 October 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Simpson J at 2; Harrison J at 3
DECISION: In the matter of GAC; appeal dismissed. In the matter of WC; appeal against conviction dismissed. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal allowed in part. Sentences imposed in respect of counts 5, 6 and 7 quashed. See paragraph 76.3 for new sentences imposed. A NON-PUBLICATION ORDER APPLIES TO THIS JUDGMENT.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction and sentence - whether evidence of police interview of complainant in 1995 wrongly admitted – whether probative value outweighed by prejudice to accused – relevance of delay in complaint – no direction sought by counsel for accused – Crown address – whether improper – no criticism by trial judge – no request for remedial direction – whether verdict unreasonable having regard to delay in complaint – whether jury should have had reasonable doubt having regard to evidence contradicting complainant – more than inconsistence or contradiction required – complainant's evidence not demonstrably or arguably unreliable or incredible – jury's verdict plainly open – CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – accumulation – head sentence reduced by fifty per cent – failure to give effect to special circumstances – non-parole period reduced from 7 years to 5 years
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 - ss 61E(1A), 61I, 61M(1), 66A, 66C(2) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2001 - reg 216(1)
Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521 Chidiac v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 432 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30 Livermore v R [2006] NSWCCA 334 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 CASES CITED: Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454 Palmer v The Queen 66 ALJR 270 R v Heather May Attard [2004] NSWCCA 376 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Dellapatrona (1993) 31 NSWLR 123 R v LWP [2003] NSWCCA 215 R v Ralph and George (1988) 37 A Crim R 202 Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate