NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Pattison v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 186
HEARING DATE(S): 14 May 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 June 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hidden J at 2; Price J at 3
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal be granted. 2. Quash the sentence imposed by Viney ADCJ for charge 11 being an offence contrary to s 112(1) of the Crimes Act 1900. 3. Sentence the applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 2 years to date from 17 November 2008 and expire on 16 November 2010 with a balance of term of 2 years and 6 months expiring on 16 May 2013 for charge 11. The earliest date the applicant will be eligible for release to parole is 16 November 2010.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentencing - multiple offences - sentence manifestly excessive.
Crimes Act 1900 s 112(1), s 177, s 154A(1)(b), LEGISLATION CITED: s 178BA(1), s 188(1), s 300(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Des Rosiers v R [2006] NSWCCA 16 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v M.A.K R v M.S.K [2006] NSWCCA 381 CASES CITED: R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 R v Webster [2005] NSWCCA 110 Regina v Fernando [2002] NSWCCA 28 Regina v Stankovic [2006] NSWCCA 229
PARTIES: Nathan John Pattison Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/143
COUNSEL: R Herps - DPP Nathan John Pattison - Self Represented
SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh - DPP
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate