NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 161 A Crim R 281
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Glen [2006] NSWCCA 153
HEARING DATE(S): 27 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Adams J at 44; Hislop J at 45
DECISION: CROWN APPEAL ALLOWED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - LIFE SENTENCE IMPOSED PRIOR TO SENTENCING ACT 1989 - APPLICATION TO REDETERMINE RESULTING IN FINITE HEAD SENTENCE AND NON PAROLE PERIOD - NECESSARY CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL PROVISION FOR INDETERMINATE SENTENCE WITH PAROLE OPPORTUNITY - CROWN APPEAL - SPECIAL PROVISION NOT REFERRED TO IN REASONS FOR REDETERMINATION - INTERVENTION TO REDETERMINE APPROPRIATE - RECAPITULATION OF FACTS - YOUTHFUL OFFENDER - OFFENCE IN WORST CASE CATEGORY - WHETHER UNSUPERVISED LIBERTY IN PUBLIC INTEREST
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Sentencing (Life Sentences) Amendment Act 1989 Sentencing (Life Sentences) Amendment Act 1993
Power v The Queen 1974 131 CLR 623 R v Jamieson & Ors 1992 60 A Crim R 68 CASES CITED: R v Kluska NSWSC unreported 18 December 1998 R v Robinson [2002] NSWCCA 359 The Queen v Paivinen 1985 158 CLR 489 The Queen v Watt 1988 165 CLR 474
PARTIES: Regina v David Jack Glen
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2270
COUNSEL: D. Woodburne (Crown/Applicant) A. Haesler SC (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh (DPP) S. O'Connor (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 01/001
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Barr J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate