NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: TOLL PTY LTD v DAKIC and ANOTHER [2006] NSWCA 58
HEARING DATE(S): 25 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Santow JA at 18; Brownie AJA at 145
DECISION: (1) Appeal dismissed. ; (2) The appellant to pay respondents' costs. ; (3) Cross-appeal allowed. ; (4) Order in proceedings No. 107 of 2004 that the first defendant pay to the plaintiff the costs payable by him to the second defendant. ; (5) First cross-respondent pay the cross-appellant's costs and have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise qualified.
CATCHWORDS: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Whether definition of "injury" covers vehicle-loading and unloading operations under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1919 (NSW) ("MACA"). - NEGLIGENCE - Whether compensation received as a result of a back injury suffered by employee removing heavy trailer ramp in confined space due to vehicle overhang after ramp had been used to load utilities onto a semi-trailer was governed by the statutory insurance scheme under MACA or by the statutory scheme under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) – Whether injury caused by an unsafe system of work – Whether injury the result of and caused during the use or operation of a vehicle by a defect in that vehicle – Whether any defect in the vehicle in its use or operation – Discussion of causation. - PROCEDURE – Issue estoppel. - COSTS – Whether Bullock order should have been awarded
Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 s3 LEGISLATION CITED: Road Transport (General) Act 1999 Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) s40
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v GSF Australia Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 26, (2005) 79 ALJR 1079 Almeida v Universal Dye Works (No. 2) [2001] NSWCA 156 AMP General Insurance Ltd v Mayne Nickless Ltd (2000) 50 NSWLR 61 Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Canterbury Municipal Council v Taylor (No. 2) [2002] NSWCA 96 Egri v DRG Australian Limited [1988] 19 NSWLR 600 Government Insurance Office of NSW v R J Green & Lloyd Pty Ltd (1966) 114 CLR 437, [1966] HCA 6 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 Insurance Commission (WA) v Container Handlers Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 89, (2004) 78 ALJR 821 Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 208 ALR 1 CASES CITED: March v Stramare (E & M H) Pty Ltd [1990-91] 171 CLR 506 Mayne Nickless Ltd v Symen [2001] NSWCA 292, (2001) 34 MVR 18 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1994-1995) 182 CLR 1 Ramsay v Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271 Somodaj v Australian Iron and Steel Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 285 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 Sved v Council of Municipality of Woollahra (1998) NSW Conv R 55-842 Tambree v Travel Compensation Fund and Ors [2004] NSWCA 24 Travel Compensation Fund v Tambree t/as R Tambree and Associates (2006) 80 ALJR 183 Walsh v Whiteley (1888) 21 QBD 371 Zurich Australia Insurance Ltd v CSR Ltd (2001) 52 NSWLR 193, [2001] NSWCA 261
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate