NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Chandra v Perpetual Trustee Victoria Limited [2006] NSWSC 1046
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 September 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 October 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Duty List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
DECISION : Notice of motion for summary judgment dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Procedure under Civil Procedure Act – Default – Remedies – Striking out and dismissal – Whether justified in denying party hearing on merits for procedural defaults - Dictates of justice – Summary judgment – need for evidence of belief in absence of defence.
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 58, 61 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.1
Cohen v McWilliam (1995) 38 NSWLR 476 Graham v Hall [2006] NSWCA 208 Kane v Wyllie [2006] NSWSC 710 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Perpetual Trustees (Victoria) Ltd v Tsai [2004] NSWSC 745 CASES CITED : Phornpisutikul v Mileto [2006] NSWSC 57 Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd v Criniti [2006] NSWSC 715 Stollznow v Calvert [1980] 2 NSWLR 749 Witten v Lombard Australia Ltd [1968] 2 NSWR 529 "Mortgage Law; What can solicitors do to reduce mortgage fraud?" (2004) Law Society Journal 52
Fatah Chandra (first plaintiff) Adje Srikandi (second plaintiff) PARTIES : Perpetual Trustee Victoria Limited (first defendant) The Department of Lands (second defendant) Stephen Richard Miller (third defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate