NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave refused with costs by the High Court - 16 November 2007
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Trustee for the Salvation Army (NSW) Property Trust & Anor v Becker & Anor [2007] NSWCA 136 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 14 & 15 May 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 June 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Ipp JA at 2; McColl JA at 137
DECISION: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Appellants to pay the costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: SUCCESSION – wills, probate and administration – validity of a will – knowledge and approval of the will – whether the testatrix approved of the contents of her will – undue influence and fraud – whether such concepts must be pleaded separately – whether the testatrix was coerced into, and did not intend and desire, the impugned disposition – whether the principal beneficiary made a wilfully false statement to gain for herself a benefit under the will – whether there existed a 'grand plan' on the part of the principal beneficiary to acquire the primary asset in the will - COSTS – whether the circumstances of this case justified the departure from the ordinary rule regarding costs in probate proceedings, namely, that costs should follow the event – Calderbank offers – whether there existed an element of genuine compromise in certain Calderbank offers made to the charities – whether the charities acted reasonably in continuing the case after the Calderbank offer had been made – whether, generally speaking, there exists a role for offers of compromise in probate actions
Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 Barry v Butlin (1838) 2 Moo PC 480 Boyse v Rossborough (1857) 6 HLC 2 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 Buckley v Maddocks (1891) 12 LR (NSW) Eq 277 Burns 'Elders and Testamentary Undue Influence in Australia' (2005) 28(1) University of New South Wales Law Journal 145 Colgate Palmolive v Cussons (1993) 118 ALR 248 Craig v Lamoureux [1920] AC 349 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Estate Late Hazel Ruby Grounds Page v Sedawie Re [2005] NSWSC 1311 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Hall v Hall (1868) LR 1 P & D 481 In the Estate of Fuld [1968] P 765 Kerridge 'Wills Made in Suspicious Circumstances: The Problem of the Vulnerable Testator' (2000) 59 Cambridge Law Journal 310 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 CASES CITED: Lowe v Guthrie [1909] AC 278 Miller v Jones [1999] NSWCA 467 Nock v Austin (1918) 25 CLR 419 Re Stott [1980] 1 All ER 259 Reginald Alfred Becker v Public Trustee of New South Wales & 2 ors [2006] NSWSC 743 Reginald Alfred Becker v Public Trustee of New South Wales & 2 ors [2006] NSWSC 1146 Revie v Druitt [2005] NSWSC 902 Ridge 'Equitable Undue Influence and Wills' (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 617 Riding v Hawkins (1889) 14 PD 56 Stanley v Mechler [2004] NSWSC 196 The Public Trustee v Mullane (Unreported Supreme Court of New South Wales Powell J 12 June 1992) White v White & Cato (1862) 2 Sw & Tr 504 Williams v Goude (1821) 1 Hag Ecc 577 Wingrove v Wingrove (1885) 11 PD 81 Winter v Crichton Estate of Galieh (1991) 23 NSWLR 116
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate