NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gavin v Inchcape Automobiles Retail Pty Limited (trading as City Automobiles) & 1 Ors [2006] NSWSC 679
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 July 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division Administrative Law List
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Malpass at 1
DECISION : The proceedings are dismissed. The Plaintiff is to pay the costs of the proceedings. The Exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Contract for sale of motor vehicle - alleged misrepresenations - case propounded before Tribunal failed by reason of findings of fact - Plaintiff cannot run a new and different case on appeal.
LEGISLATION CITED : Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001, ss 65, 67
Kevin Gavin (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Inchcape Automobiles Retail Pty Limited (trading as City Automobiles) (First Defendant) Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30076/05
Mr P Bruckner (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr A Moses (First Defendant) Submitting Appearance (Second Defendant)
Kevin Solari, Solicitor (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Ellen Beerworth & Associates (First Defendant) I V Knight, Crown Solicitor (Second Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of NSW
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : MV 04/03174
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Mr Carpentieri
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION : 15 August 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
Associate Justice Malpass
Thursday, 6 July 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate