NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 164 A Crim R 481
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272
HEARING DATE(S): 28/08/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 September 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Whealy J at 1; Howie J at 1
DECISION: The appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Appeal - Crown appeal against sentence - whether fully concurrent sentence inadequate - relationship between s 3A of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act and principle of totality - vulnerability under s 21A(2)(1) of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 - ss 61AJ, 66C(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - ss 3A, 21A(2)
R v Tadrosse [2005] NSWCCA 145 R v Ibrahimi [2005] NSWCCA 153 R v MA [2004] NSWCCA 92 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616 CASES CITED: R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 R v Brown [1999] NSWCCA 323 R v Janceski (No. 2) [2005] NSWCCA 288 R v Gorman (2002) 137 A Crim R 326 R v Hammoud (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Makarian v The Queen (2005) 79 ALJR 1048
PARTIES: Regina v MMK
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/906
COUNSEL: R. Cogswell SC with J. Caldwell - Crown A. Haesler SC - Applicant
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh - Crown S. O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2003/149
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate