NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REESE, David Robert v R [2006] NSWCCA 421
HEARING DATE(S): 16 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1, 21, 23; Simpson J at 2; Howie J at 22
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 03/16/2006
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against sentence – specially aggravated break, enter and steal – assault occasioning actual bodily harm - plea of guilty – subjective circumstances – relevance of prior record – whether sentence manifestly excessive
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900
CASES CITED: Veen (No 2) v The Queen [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465
PARTIES: David Robert Reese (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2383
COUNSEL: A Francis (Applicant) P Miller (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S O'Connor - Legal Aid Commission (Applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/0035
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Delaney DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 29 April 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2005/2383
SULLY J SIMPSON J HOWIE J
16 March 2006 REESE, David Robert v R Judgment
1 SULLY J: The court is in a position to express a view about this application. Justice Simpson will deliver the first judgment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate