NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bailey v Bailey [2006] NSWSC 756
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 May 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 July 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Leave to amend refused
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - pleadings - amendment to pleadings - proposed amendment not complying with rules of pleading - impossibility of pleading to it - leave to amend refused
Bruce Clyde Bailey (First Plaintiff) Janet Beatrice Shafik Bailey (Second Plaintiff) Arnold Neil Bailey (First Defendant) PARTIES : Glenice Margaret Bailey (Second Defendant) Annette Mavis Bailey (Third Defendant) Terence Jessop (Fourth Defendant) Robert Walter Locke and other persons named in the First Schedule to the Statement of Claim who constitute the Partnership Locke O'Reilly McHugh (Fifth Defendants) John Baines Cheadle and other persons named in the Second Schedule to the Statement of Claim who constitute the Partnership practising as Holman Webb (Sixth Defendants)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2313 of 2002
Mr C J Bevan with him Mr R Young (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : In Person(First Defendant) No Appearance (Second and Third Defendants) (B J Miller as amicus curiae) Mr D Pritchard (Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Defendants)
Turner Freeman (Plaintiffs) In Person (First Defendant) SOLICITORS : No Appearance (Second and Third Defendants (BJ Miller as amicus curiae)) Ebsworth & Ebsworth (Fourth Defendant) Middletons (Fifth Defendant) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Sixth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate