NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Le v R [2007] NSWCCA 330
HEARING DATE(S): 23 November 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hall J at 2; Price J at 4
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 23 November 2007
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal be granted if required. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. The sentences imposed on counts 1, 2, 3 and 4 be quashed. 4. The matter be remitted to the District Court to there be heard and determined by a Judge of that Court according to law. 5. As the sentencing Judge accepted Nguyen's evidence the sentencing proceedings are to be commenced again so far as the applicant is concerned before another Judge of the District Court.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentencing - procedural fairness - duress - evidence of a co-offender taken in the absence of the applicant and legal representatives - procedural fairness denied.
Crimes Act 1900 s 86(3), s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 21A(3)(d)
PARTIES: William Le Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/5187
COUNSEL: M Dennis (Applicant) N Adams (Crown)
SOLICITORS: S O'Connor (Applicant) S Kavanagh Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/11/0832
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Bennett DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 20 October 2006
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Regina v William Le
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/5187
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate