NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave refused with costs by the High Court - 16 May 2008
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: State of New South Wales v Jackson [2007] NSWCA 279
HEARING DATE(S): 23 July 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 October 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Giles JA at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: PRIVILEGE - client legal privilege - school accident - accident form completed by teacher - teacher obtained statements from witnesses - whether statements were confidential documents within meaning in Evidence Act 1995 - consideration of implied obligation not to disclose contents - no obligation - not confidential documents - whether court will inspect documents for which privilege claimed - can inspect and did so because might have contained something material to confidentiality - whether dominant purpose of provision of professional legal services relating to anticipated proceedings - consideration of when proceedings are anticipated - was the dominant purpose - but statements not privileged because not confidential documents.
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995, Div 1 Pt 3.10
Amalgamated Television Services Ltd v Marsden [1999] NSWCA 97; Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1998) 81 FCR 526; Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Rural Press Ltd (2000) 96 FCR 141; AWB Ltd v Cole (2006) 152 FCR 382; Bulk Materials (Coal Handling) Services Pty Ltd v Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd (1998) 13 NSWLR 689; Carnell v Mann (1998) 89 FCR 247; Cataldi v Commissioner for Government Transport (1970) 1 NSWLR 65; Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Co Ltd [1999] NSWSC 975; Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49; Fagan v State of New South Wales [2004] NSWCA 182; Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd (2005) 60 ATR 466; General Accident Assurance Company v Chrusz (1999) 180 DLR (4th) 241; Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674; Harmony Shipping Co v Saudi Europe Line (1979) 1 WLR 1380; CASES CITED: J-Corp Pty Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers Federated Union of Workers (1992) 110 ALR 510; Mallalla District Council v Livestock Markets Ltd (2006) 94 SASR 258; Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332; Newcastle Wallsend Coal Co Pty Ltd v Court of Coal Mines Regulation (1997) 42 NSWLR 351; Nickmar Pty Ltd v Preservatrice Skandia Insurance Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 44; Ritz Hotel Ltd v Charles of the Ritz Ltd (No 22) (1988) 14 NSWLR 132; Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd [2005] FCA 864; Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd [2005] FCAFC 125; Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2005] NSWCA 47; Tooheys Ltd v Housing Commission of New South Wales (1952) 20 LGR 236; Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244; Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Rickard Hails Moretti Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 234; Warner v Women's Hospital (1954) VLR 410; Woollahra Municipal Council v Westpac Banking Corporation (1994) 33 NSWLR 529.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate