NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brambles Australia Limited Trading As CHEP Australia v Tatale Pty Limited & Anor [2006] NSWSC 640
HEARING DATE(S) : 9 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Bergin J
DECISION : Leave granted on conditions.
CATCHWORDS : [PLEADINGS] - application for leave to file Amended Cross-Claim - extensive use of cross-referencing - obscurity - whether various claims including claims of implied warranties under s 69 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 should be permitted.
LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
ACCC v C G Berbatis Holdings Pty Limited (2003) 214 CLR 51 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Brambles Australia Limited t/as CHEP Australia v Tatale Pty Limited & Anor [2006] NSWSC 204 Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 Crabb v Arun District Council [1976] Ch 179 CASES CITED : Edwin Hill & Partners v First National Finance Corp plc [1988] 3 All ER 801 Henry Berry & Co Pty Ltd v Rushton [1937] St R Qd 109 James v Commonwealth (1939) 62 CLR 339 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 Perre & Ors v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 Zhu v Treasurer of NSW (2004) 218 CLR 530
Brambles Australia Limited t/as CHEP Australia - Plaintiff/ Respondent PARTIES : Tatale Pty Limited - First Defendant/ Applicant Venasti Pty Limited - Second Defendant/ Applicant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50109/2005
COUNSEL : Mr B Coles QC, Mr PT Russell - Plaintiff/ Respondent Mr JJ Garnsey QC, Mr JP Redmond - First and Second Defendants/ Applicants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate