NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Building Insurers' Guarantee Corp v A&MI Hanson Pty Ltd & Ors [2006] NSWSC 381 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 7 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/07/2006
DECISION : I order that the respondent Colin Biggers & Paisley Solicitors pay the applicant/plaintiff's costs of the motion filed on 28 March 2006.; I decline to make any order for costs of the fifth cross-defendant.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE – Privilege – non-privilege documents communicated to lawyer for advice do not thereby gain privilege – COSTS – where solicitors unsuccessfully maintain claim of privilege in respect of former client's documents
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 119
PLAINTIFF Building Insurers' Guarantee Corporation (P)
DEFENDANTS A&MI Hanson Pty Ltd (ACN 001 838 697) (D1) Baykeel Pty Ltd (ACN 003 950 598) (D2) 85 Spring Street Properties Pty Ltd (ACN 005 822 275) (D3)
FIRST CROSS-CLAIM A&MI Hanson Pty Ltd (ACN 001 838 697) (Cross-Claimant to First Cross-Claim) Baykeel Pty Ltd (ACN 003 950 598) (Cross-Defendant to First Cross-Claim)
SECOND CROSS-CLAIM A&MI Hanson Pty Ltd (ACN 001 838 697) (Cross-Claimant to Second Cross-Claim) PARTIES : 85 Spring Street Properties Pty Ltd (ACN 005 822 275) (Cross-Defendant to Second Cross-Claim)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate