NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 166 A Crim R 406
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Chaaban [2006] NSWCCA 352 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 18 October 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Hidden J at 15; Bell J at 51
DECISION: Appeal allowed (by majority) - respondent re-sentenced on the second charge to a fixed term of imprisonment for 3 years and 4 months from 14 July 2004; on the first charge a non-parole period of 2 years and 10 months from the 14 July 2005 and ending on 13 May 2008, with the balance of term of 2 years and 9 months from 14 May 2008 and ending on the 13 February 2011.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW: - Crown appeal against sentence imposed by Court of Criminal Appeal - Criminal Appeal Act, s5DA - respondent's failure to fulfil undertaking to give evidence against co-offender - respondent threatened and assaulted - Court's discretion not to intervene
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Evidence Act 1995
R v El-Sayed (2003) 57 NSWLR 659 R v Bagnall & Russell (unrep, 10 June 1994) R v Chaaban [2006] NSWCCA 107 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92 CASES CITED: R v DV [2005] NSWCCA 319 R v Hocking [2000] NSWCCA 339 R v KS [2005] NSWCCA 87 R v O'Brien (CCA unreported 10 June 1993) R v Waqa (2004) 149 A Crim R 143 R v Hammond (2002) 121 A Crim R 1
PARTIES: Regina (applicant) Nazmi Chaaban (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate