NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 203 FLR 322
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Chapel Road v ASIC [2006] NSWSC 1014
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 September 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
DECISION : (1) The statement of claim filed 19 January 2006 is dismissed; (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Strike out statement of claim - malicious prosecution does it extend to cover administrative decisions - misfeasance in public office
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - ss 8, 246, 93AA(1) Commonwealth Crimes Act 1900 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law - ss 836, 837, 786(2)(e), 788(1) Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) - 7.3.02 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - Parts 13.4(1) & 14.28(1)
A v State of New South Wales & Ors [2005] NSWCA 292 A v State of New South Wales & Ors [2006] HCATrans 495 (5 September 2006) A v State of New South Wales & Ors [2006] HCATrans 496 (6 September 2006) Beach Club Port Douglas Pty Limited v Page [2005] QCA 475 Beck v Spalla [2005] FCAFC 82 Butler v Simmonds, Crowley & Galvin (Unreported, QSC, 8 October 1998 Commonwealth Life Assurance Society Limited v Brain [1935] HCA 40 Commonwealth Life Assurance Society Ltd v Smith (1938) 59 CLR 527 Commonwealth Life Assurance Society v Smith (1938) 59 CLR 527 Dunlop v Woollahra Municipal Council [1982] AC 158 Elliot v Chief Constable of Wiltshire & Ors, Sir Richard Scott The Times Law Reports 5.12.1996 Gibson v Parkes District Hospital (1991) 26 NSWLR 9 Gregory v Portsmouth City Council (1997) 96 LGR 569 Gregory v Portsmouth City Council [2000] 1 AC 419 Herniman v Smith [1938] AC 305 Hospitals Contribution Fund of Australia v Hunt (1982) 44 ALR 365 Khodaparast v Shad [2000] 1 All ER 545 Little v Law Institute of Victoria & Ors (No 3) [1990] VR 257 Lonrho Plc v Fayed (No 5) [1994] 1 All ER 188, [1993] 1 WLR 1489 Metropolitan Bank Ltd v Pooley (1885) 10 App Cas 210 CASES CITED : Northern Territory of Australia v Mengel (1995) 185 CLR 307 Porter v OAMPS Ltd & Ors (2005) 215 ALR 327 Quartz Hill Consolidated Gold Mining Co v Eyre (1883) 11 QBD 674 Rich v ASIC [2004] HCA 42 Sanders v Snell (1998) 72 ALJR 1508 Savile v Roberts (1698) 1 Ld Raym 374 Tampion v Anderson [1973] VR 715 at 720 Varawa v Howard Smith & Co Ltd (1911) 13 CLR 35 Wiffin v Bailey & Romford Urban District Council [1915] 1 KB 600 Williams & Ors v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 17th ed (1995) Cockburn and M Thomas, "Personal Liability of Public Officers in the Tort of Misfeasance in Public Office – Part 1" (2001) 9 TLJ 80 at 245 Halsbury, 2nd ed Vol 22 at 26.42 and 4th ed. Vol 54 at 4625.1371 Law of Torts in New Zealand, LBC, Sydney, 1991 at 782 Restatement of the Law, Torts 2d (1977) Balkin and Davis S Kneebone "Misfeasance in Public Office after Mengel's Case: A Special Tort no More" (1996) 4 TortL Rev 111 at 121-34T Salmond and Heusten on the Law of Torts, 21st ed (1987) Fleming J Text Book of The Law of Tort (1937) at 647-48 The Law of Torts 3rd ed 2004 Butterworths The Law of Torts 9th ed 1998 at 687 The Law of Torts 9th ed at 674
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate