NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REGINA v. SMITH [2006] NSWCCA 129
HEARING DATE(S): Tuesday 21 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 April 2006
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Simpson J at 2; Hall J at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Crown appeal - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - supply of a commercial quantity of ecstasy - principles in relation to the determination of a Crown appeal against sentence in the case of young offender (18 years of age)
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985
R v Bimahendali [1999] NSWCCA 409 R v Dang [2005] NSWCCA 430 R v Peel (1971) 1 NSWLR 247 R v Harmouche [2005] NSWCCA 398 R v Readman (1990) 47 A Crim R 181 R v Chang [2003] NSWCCA 2327 CASES CITED: R v Huynh [2003] NSWCCA 239 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v Collins[2000] NSWCCA 236 R v O'Brien & Anor (CCA, unreported 23 August 1989) R v Wong & Ng (1988) 39 A Crim R 1 R v MD, BM, NA, JT [2005] NSWCCA 242
PARTIES: REGINA v. KEVIN SMITH
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA No. 2005/1954
COUNSEL: Crown: Ms. V. Lydiard Resp: Ms. A. Francis
SOLICITORS: Crown: S. Kavanagh Resp: S.E. O'Connor
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/110202
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Woods, DCJ.
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 09/08/2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/1954
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate