NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Silver v Dome Resources NL [2006] NSWSC 26
HEARING DATE(S) : 14 September, 11 November and 6 December 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 February 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Rulings on late applications to rely on arguments not previously put and to further amend defence.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [101] Supreme Court procedure - Practice under Supreme Court Rules – Amendment - Whether amendment necessary for defendants to rely on particular subject matter - Relevant considerations - Prejudice – Lateness of application – Overriding purpose.
Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 56 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 15 rr 7 & 18 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 14.7, 14.19, 36.1
ASIC v Rich [2005] NSWSC 706 Hannover Life Re of Australasia Limited v Sayseng [2005] NSWCA 214 Harvey v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 255 CASES CITED : Ingot & Ors v Macquarie & Ors [2004] NSWSC 1219 Musumeci v Winadell Pty Ltd (1994) 34 NSWLR 723 Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 107 Vodafone Pacific Ltd v Mobile Innovations Ltd [2004] NSWCA 15 Woodside Petroleum Development Pty Ltd v H & R-E & W Pty Ltd (1999) 20 WAR 380
Michael Bernard Silver (P1 & XD1) PARTIES : Fair Choice Limited (P2 & XD2) Dome Resources NL (D1 & XC1) Durban Roodepoort Deep Limited (D2 & XC2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2586/01
COUNSEL : J E Thomson and M J Watts (Ps & XDs) T G R Parker SC (Ds & XCs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate