NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: T v R [2007] NSWCCA 62
HEARING DATE(S): 1/3/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 March 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1; Bell J at 2; Hoeben J at 29
DECISION: Grant leave to appeal; Dismiss the appeal
CATCHWORDS: Sentencing - offence subject to standard non-parole period - special circumstances applied to extend sentence
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19 R v Barkho [2005] NSWCCA 211 R v Bloomfield (1998) 44 NSWLR 734 CASES CITED: R v P [2004] NSWCCA 218 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168
PARTIES: T (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/2530
COUNSEL: Ms C Loukas (Applicant) Mr R Herps (Crown)
SOLICITORS: S.E. O'Connor (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/2015
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Knight DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/2530 CCAP
SULLY J BELL J HOEBEN J
Friday 16 March 2007 T v R
Judgment
1 SULLY J: I agree with Bell J.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate