NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Sangha v Baxter [2007] NSWCA 264
HEARING DATE(S): 31/07/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 September 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Ipp JA at 1; Campbell JA at 27; Young CJ in Eq at 28
DECISION: (1) The appeal is upheld; (2) The judgment and orders made by the trial judge are set aside; (3) The matter is remitted to the District Court for retrial; (4) The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal; (5) The respondent to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if otherwise entitled; (6) The costs of the trial to be determined by the trial judge at the remitted trial.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL- When appeal lies- Error of law- Failure to give adequate reasons for decision- Appeal in negligence action- Appellant raised defences of self-defence, criminal enterprise and contributory negligence at trial- Primary judge largely rejects defences- Judge gives reasons seemingly without aid of transcript- Omits reference to significant parts of evidence- Held judge failed in reasons to properly engage with appellant's case- New trial ordered. TORTS- Negligence - Contributory negligence- How assessed- Primary judge erred in principle- Apportionment of liability revised. TORTS- Negligence- Miscellaneous defences- Illegality of plaintiff's activity- Discussion of Civil Liability Act, s 54- Damages not awarded if plaintiff injured following his committing a serious offence- Injury follows offence if clearly associated with it in time, place and circumstances.
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002, ss 5R, 52, 53, 54
Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Consolidated Broken Hill v Edwards (2005) Aust Torts Rep 81-815 Gala v Preston (1991) 172 CLR 243 Godbolt v Fittock (1963) 63 SR (NSW) 617 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALJR 492 CASES CITED: Re Lean (1993) 66 A Crim R 296 Smith v Jenkins (1970) 119 CLR 397 Teper v The Queen [1952] AC 480 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422 Whalan v Kogarah Municipal Council [2007] NSWCA 5 Zecevic v DPP (1987) 162 CLR 645
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate