NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1239 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 18/10/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 November 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Order that applicant pay respondent's costs
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - costs - whether costs should follow the event - no matter of principle
LEGISLATION CITED : Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, s.127 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rule 42.1
CASES CITED : Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1188
Onefone Australia Pty Limited - First Plaintiff DCA Resources Australia Pty Limited - Second Plaintiff Pacific Finance Group Pty Limited - Third Plaintiff PARTIES : Talent2 Works Pty Ltd - Fourth Plaintiff One.Tel Limited - First Defendant Steven Sherman - Second Defendant Peter Walker - Third Defendant Paul Gerard Weston - Special Purpose Liquidator
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5291/03
COUNSEL : Mr R.D. Glasson - Applicant - Special Purpose Liquidator Mr D.R. Stack - Respondent - Australian Securities and Investments Commission
SOLICITORS : NOT Lawyers - Special Purpose Liquidator Georgina Hayden - Solicitor for Australian Securities and Investments Commission
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
BARRETT J
FRIDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate