NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hudson Investment Group v Australian Hardboards Ltd; Australian Hardboards Ltd v Hudson Investment Group Ltd [2006] NSWSC 840
HEARING DATE(S) : 16/08/2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
DECISION : Fresh proceedings stayed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Stay of proceedings - Application for orders working out order for specific performance - Fresh proceedings by other party on basis a new case raised - Principles for stay of proceedings - Principles for working out court orders - Each party relying upon events that occurred after judgment - Whether fresh proceedings raised a new case or new issues that could be raised in defence of working out orders
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
McHenry v Lewis (1882) 22 Ch 397 Williams v Hunt [1905] 1 KB 512 CASES CITED : Reynolds v Reynolds [1977] 2 NSWLR 295 Burbank Australia Pty Ltd v Luzinat [2000] VSC 128 Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206 Muriti v Prendergast [2005] NSWSC 281
In 50066/04: Hudson Investment Group Ltd - Plaintiff Australian Hardboards Ltd - 1st Defendant Bremer Park Ltd - 2nd Defendant PARTIES : AH Bremer Park Pty Ltd - 3rd Defendant
In 3839/06: Australian Hardboards Ltd - Plaintiff Hudson Investment Group Ltd - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50066/04 ; 3839/06
COUNSEL : Newlinds SC & Naomi Sharp - Australian Hardboards Ltd, Bremer Park Ltd & AH Bremer Park Pty Ltd Peter Wood - Hudson Investment Group Ltd
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate