NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave application refused with costs by the High Court - 16 May 2008
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Monie v Commonwealth of Australia [2007] NSWCA 230 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 17 & 18 May 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 September 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Campbell JA at 3
DECISION: In substance, appeal allowed, verdict for Peter Monie for $238,750 plus interest; verdict for Jennifer Monie for $50,000 plus interest; new trial for Sam Monie on causation and quantum of damages (if any) excluding economic loss. Further submissions to be made concerning costs.
CATCHWORDS: TORTS – negligence – essentials of action for negligence – duty of care – duty of care owed by Commonwealth Employment Service to prospective employer – where prospective employee referred by Commonwealth Employment Service was ex-offender – where Commonwealth Employment Service aware that prospective employee was ex-offender – where Commonwealth Employment Service failed to inform prospective employer that prospective employee was ex-offender – where employee subsequently shot employer – whether Commonwealth liable for damages suffered by employer - TORTS – negligence – voluntary assumption of risk (volenti not fit injuria) – requirements for finding of voluntary assumption of risk – where employer consented to having an ex-offender work and live on property – whether employer voluntarily consented to risk of being shot by employee - Smith v Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 - Letang v Ottawa Electric Railway Company [1926] AC 725 - Osborne v London and North Western Railway Company (1888) 21 QBD 220 - Randwick City Council v Muzic [2006] NSWCA 66, applied - TORTS – negligence – contributory negligence – elements of contributory negligence – causation – where employer failed to adequately interview prospective employee – where employee subsequently shot employer – whether employer's failure to adequately interview was causative of damages suffered - TORTS – negligence – damages – assessment of general damages – past loss – interest on past loss – future loss – date as at which assessment of damages should occur on appeal - TORTS – negligence – damages – psychiatric illness – whether recognisable psychiatric illness suffered - Tame v New South Wales - Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited (2002) 211 CLR 317, followed - TORTS – negligence – damages – economic loss – whether negligent act causative of economic loss sustained by farm business - TORTS – negligence – damages – causation – where damage caused by combination of negligent act and other factors – whether negligent act causative of damage - March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506, followed - COURTS AND JUDGES – pleadings – statement of claim – case abandoned – where statement of claim amended – whether part of case abandoned by amendment of statement of claim - COURTS AND JUDGES – witnesses – credit finding – adverse credit finding by trial judge – role of appellate court - APPEALS – where trial judge erred in making adverse credit findings – where adverse credit findings resulted in failure of plaintiff's case – role of appellate court – need for retrial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate