NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 173 A Crim R 226
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: KJR v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 165 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 8 November 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 June 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Simpson J at 2; Rothman J at 13
DECISION: (1) Conviction appeal dismissed; (2) Leave to appeal against sentence granted; (3) Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – plea of not guilty – sexual offences – assault occasioning actual bodily harm – directions given by trial judge – tendency evidence - delay - SENTENCING - special circumstances - whether sentences manifestly excessive
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
Chahine v R [2006] NSWCCA 179 Crampton v The Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161 DPP v Boardman [1975] AC 421 Doggett v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 343 Hutchinson v RTA [2000] NSWCA 332 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 R v BWT (2002) 54 NSWLR 241 R v DRE [2006] NSWCCA 280 CASES CITED: R v Ellis (2003) 144 A Crim R 1 R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338 R v Gardiner [2006] NSWCCA 190 R v Ngatikaura [2006] NSWCCA 161 R v Tripodina (1988) 35 A Crim R 183 R v TWP [2006] NSWCCA 141 R v Williams (1990) 50 A Crim R 213 Weiss v R (2005) 224 CLR 300 Wright v R [2006] NSWCCA 122
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate