NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Kandt Stening Group Pty Ltd v Stening [2006] NSWSC 307
HEARING DATE(S) : 13 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/13/2006
DECISION : In principle, leave to cross-claim to be allowed, and statutory derivative action permitted. Pleading of basis for account of profits claim required.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Supreme Court procedure - leave to bring cross-claim out of time - nature of relationship required between cross-claim and subject of the first proceedings - construction of section 22 Civil Procedure Act 2005 - CORPORATIONS - practice and procedure - statutory derivative action under section 237 Corporations Act 2001 - no question of principle - PROCEDURE - Supreme Court procedure - pleading - claim for account of profits - need to plead basis of claim
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CASES CITED : Biscayne Partners Pty Limited v Valance Corp Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 874 Town & Country Property Management Services v Kaltoum [2002] NSWSC 166
PARTIES : Kandt Stening Group Pty Limited - Plaintiff/Respondent Peter Edward Stening - Defendant/Applicant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4935/05
COUNSEL : SA Wells - Plaintiff/Respondent J Miller - Defendant/Applicant
SOLICITORS : Christopher C Freeman & Co - Plaintiff/Respondent Dibbs Abbott Stillman - Defendant/Applicant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EQUITY LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate