NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2006] NSWSC 336
HEARING DATE(S) : 18 & 19 April, 2 & 4 May, 7 June, 28 & 29 July, 15 & 16 September, 6 & 18 October and 2 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 27 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Sixth defendant restrained from using for future costs of these proceedings with certain exceptions property the subject of the plaintiffs' judicial advice application. Application for injunction otherwise refused.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY [338] Equitable remedies - Injunctions - Interlocutory injunctions – Application to restrain use of property alleged to be subject to charitable trust to pay defendants' costs of proceedings - Appropriate balancing exercise.
LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 52A r 42 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.25
Alsop Wilkinson (A Firm) v Neary [1996] 1 WLR 1220 Application of Macedonian Orthodox Community Church of St Petka Incorporated [2004] NSWSC 388 Application of Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated (No 2) [2005] NSWSC 558 Chandler v Church Chancery Division 21 December 1987 unreported Harman J Drummond v Drummond [1999] NSWSC 923 Hayman v Equity Trustees Ltd (2003) 8 VR 548 His Eminence Metropolitan Petar, Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia & New Zealand v Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated NSWCA 8 December 2004 unreported Kirwan v Cresvale Far East Ltd (in liq) (2002) 44 ACSR 21 Kolback Securities Limited v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2003] NSWSC 262 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2003] NSWSC 1089 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2004] NSWSC 210 CASES CITED : Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2004] NSWSC 439 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2005] NSWSC 330 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2005] NSWSC 331 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2005] NSWSC 332 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2005] NSWSC 384 National Trustees Executors and Agency Co of Australasia Ltd v Barnes (1941) 64 CLR 268 PCW (Underwriting Agencies) Ltd v Dixon [1983] 2 All ER 158 Re Beddoe; Downes v Cotton [1893] 1 Ch 547 Re Biddencare Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 160 United Mizrahi Bank Ltd v Doherty [1998] 1 WLR 435 Walters v Woodbridge (1878) 7 Ch D 504 Biscoe on Mareva and Anton Piller Orders (2005) [6.21] Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies (4th ed, 2002) [21-375], [21-380]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate