NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cotie v Cox [2006] NSWSC 859
HEARING DATE(S) : 4 August 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Latham J
DECISION : 1. The Second Defendant/First Cross-Defendant (the hospital) pay the First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant's costs on the First and Second Cross-Claims in proceedings 20435/01, 20433/01 and 20434/01; 2. The First Defendant (Dr Cox) pay the Second Defendant's costs on the Notice of Motion.
CATCHWORDS : Costs - s 98 Civil Procedure Act - Rule 42.1 UCP Rules - whether costs follow the event - successful party on hearing of cross-claims.
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005
Rhonda Ballard v Wendy Louise Cox & Anor. [2006] NSWSC 252 Diamond v Simpson (No. 4) [2004] NSWSC 57 Patten v Moffat & Ors. [1999] NSWSC 1322 Proctor & Gamble Pty Ltd v Australian Slatwall Industries Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 398 CASES CITED : New South Wales Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Edkins (1998) 45 NSWLR 8 Harris v Schembri NSWSC 7 November 1995 Grygiel v Baine & Ors. [No. 2] [2005] NSWCA 434 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534
Plaintiff - Spencer Cotie by his Tutor Mike Cotie PARTIES : Defendant 1 - Wendy Louise Cox Defendant 2 - Prince of Wales Private Hospital
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20434/2001
Plaintiff - Not represented COUNSEL : Defendant 1 - DJ Higgs SC / J Downing Defendant 2 - MJ Fordham
Plaintiff - Not representend SOLICITORS : Defendant 1 - Tresscox Lawyers Defendant 2 - Minter Ellison Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate