NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Bichar v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 1
HEARING DATE(S): 17/01/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 January 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Howie J at 2; Hall J at 28
DECISION: Application for leave to appeal against sentence is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentence - armed robbery - failing to give discount for plea of guilty based upon Henry guideline - whether drug addiction mitigating - whether any less sentence warranted.
Crimes Act 1900 - s 97(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 21A(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6(3)
R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Sundar [2005] NSWCCA 93 CASES CITED: R v Johnson [2005] NSWCCA 186 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455 R v Ibrahimi [2005] NSWCCA 153 R v Solomon (2005) 153 A Crim R 32 R v SY [2003] NSWCCA 291 R v Gagalowicz [2005] NSWCCA 452
PARTIES: Therry Gillar Bichar v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1860
COUNSEL: V. Lydiard - Crown A. Francis - Applicant
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh - Crown S. O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/0017
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Phegan DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/1860
BASTEN JA HOWIE J HALL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate