NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) 14 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-730
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : On Tai Fung v Janice Rosemary Stocovaz [2006] NSWSC 1345 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 20/11/06 21/11/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 December 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Patten AJ at 1
DECISION : See paragraph 41
Roper v Johnson (1873) LR 8 C.P. 167 Darbishire v Warran [1963] 3 All ER 310 Jansen v Dewhurst [1969] VR 421 Hoad v Scone Motors Pty Ltd [1977] 1 NSWLR 88 Murphy v Brown (1985) 1 NSWLR 131 Hyder Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wilh Wilhelmsen Agency Pty Ltd (2001) NSWCA 313 CASES CITED : Port Kembla Coal Terminal v Braverus Maritime Inc (2004) 140 FCR 445 Consort Express Lines Ltd v J-Mac Pty Ltd (2006) FCA 833 Lodge Holes Colliery Company Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1908) AC 323 The Board of Governors of the Hospitals For Sick Children and another v Mc Lauglin & Harvey PLC and others (1990) 19 Con LR Harriton v Stephens (2004) NSWLR 694 Radford v De Froberville and another (1978) 1 All ER 33 at page 44. Moore v DER Ltd (1971) 1 WLR 1477
PARTIES : On Tai Fung - Plaintiff Janice Rosemary Stocovaz - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 15618 of 2005; 20046 of 2006
COUNSEL : J. Alexis SC with J Gruzman - Plaintiff J Glissan QC with K Manion - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Gells Lawyers - Plaintiff CKB Partners - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate