NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Clark v Auspicious Yacht Sales Pty Limited & Ors; Gibbs & Anor v Auspicious Yacht Sales Pty Limited & Ors [2006] NSWSC 37
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 February 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Divsion
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Malpass at 1
DECISION : The service of the amended ordinary statement of claim on the fourth defendant is set aside; the plaintiffs are to pay the fourth defendant's costs of the notice of motion; the exhibit may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Service in Florida - application to set aside service - process fails to plead a cause of action and to demonstrate the meeting of jurisdictional requirements - onus - discretionary remedy.
Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CASES CITED : Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Elliott v Bali Bungy Co [2002] NSWSC 906
Graeme Max Clark (Plaintiff) Kim Ragel (Plaintiff) Graig Gibbs (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Auspicious Yacht Sales Pty Limited (First Defendant) Christine Szewczuk (Second Defendant) Volodymir Szewczuk (Third Defendant) Hunter Marine Corporation (Fourth Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20210/05; 20196/05
COUNSEL : Mr M Zammit (Plaintiffs) Mr N Manousaridis (Fourth Defendant)
Ramensky Lawyers (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : Thomson Playford (First, Second & Third Defendants) Joan Fitzhenry (Fourth Defendant)
- 6 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate