NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina (C'Wealth) v Baladjam & Ors [No 43] [2008] NSWSC 1461
HEARING DATE(S) : 19/08/08; 20/08/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 2008
JURISDICTION : Criminal
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : Decline to exclude evidence of statements made by Khaled Cheikho.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Application to exclude evidence of alleged co-conspirator - Whether evidence inadmissible because of hearsay rule (s 59 Evidence Act 1995) - Whether evidence should be excluded because of incompetency to give evidence - s 61 of Evidence Act 1995 - Whether evidence should be excluded under ss 135 and 137 Evidence Act 1995 - Whether evidence should be excluded under s 90 Evidence Act 1995
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995
Cox v State of NSW (2007) NSWSC 471 per Simpson J at (11) - (17) EM v R [2007] 239 ALR 204; [2007] HCS 46 at [109] per Gummow and Hayne JJ Jackson v The Queen (1962) 108 CLR 51 Kamelah v R [2005] 79 ALJR 541; [2005] 213 ALR 97; [2005] HCA 2 Papakosmis v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 Oeng Hengky Wiryo v HKSAR [2007] HKCFA 8, 9 February 2007 R v Baladjam [No 3] 18 March 2008 R v Baladjam [No 8] 15 April 2008 R v Barbara & Rovere (2000) 112 A Crim R 551, 559 at 42 R v Clark [2001] 123 A Crim R 506 at 577 (147) R v Ivan Djerke [2006] ACTSC 104 (10 October 2006) R v GK [2001] 53 NSWLR 317 at 324 R v Hannes [2000] 158 FLR 359, 441-2 AT (480) R v Michael John Parker (1990) 19 NSWLR 177 CASES CITED : R v Polkinghorne (1929) 109 A Crim R 189, 193 at (25) R v Khaled Sharrouf [No 2] 28 June 2008 at para 23 R v Yates (2002) NSWCCA 520 at (252) Sinclair v The King (1946) 73 CLR 316 Walton v R (1989) 16 CLR 283 at (9), (24) and (31) Cases on ss 135 and 137 - Evidence Act R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 R v Cook [2001] 123 A Crim R 506 at 577 (147) R v EM (2003) NSWCCA 374 R v Lodhi (2007) NSWCCA 360 at 174-177 R v Mundine (2008) NSWCCA 55 at 33 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 101 at para 29 R v Shamouil (2006) 66 NSWLR 228 at 47 to 65 R v SJRC [2007] NSWCCA 142 R v Sood [2007] NSWCCA 214 at 26-43 R v Suteski (2002) 56 NSWLR 182 at 199 (116)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate