NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jajaw v State of NSW [2007] NSWSC 725
HEARING DATE(S) : 08/06/2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 9 July 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Hoeben J at 1
DECISION : Orders 3 and 4 of the Notice of Motion are refused.; The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the motion.
CATCHWORDS : Interrogatories sought by plaintiff in claim for malicious prosecution - "special reasons" test - application of "necessity" test.
Crown Proceedings Act 1988 Police Act 1990 LEGISLATION CITED : DCR Part 22A, rules 1-6 SCR Part 24 rules 1-6 UCPR Part 22 rules 1 and 2
A v NSW [2007] 81 ALJR 763 Binks v North Sydney Council [2001] NSWSC 27 Boscolo v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1999) 90 FCR 531 Boyle v Downs (1979) 1 NSWLR 192 Cavric v Coopers & Lybrand (ACT) Limited & Anor [2002] NSWSC 538 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR(NSW) 564 Griebart v Morris [1920] 1 KB 659 CASES CITED : Haywood v Collaroy Services Beach Club [2005] NSWSC 1203 Lang v Australian Coastal Shipping Commission (1974) 2 NSWLR 70 Mitchell v John Heine & Son Limited (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 466 Newcastle City Council v Kern Land Pty Ltd & Anor (No 1) unreported, 9 December 1996, McLelland CJ in Eq Priest v State of NSW [2006] NSWSC 12 R v Gould (1993) 67 A Crim R 297 Schutt v Queenan & Anor [2000] NSWCA 341 Yamazaki v Mustaca [1999] NSWSC 1083
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate