NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: BRADBERY v REGINA [2008] NSWCCA 93 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 4 March 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 May 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Latham J at 2; Mathews AJ at 3
DECISION: Application for leave granted, the appeal allowed and the sentences imposed in the District Court be quashed. New sentences imposed.-
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW: Sentence – sexual assaults committed in the early 1970's – sentencing to replicate sentencing practices of the earlier time – non-availability of remissions not a relevant matter – non-parole period to reflect pattern of sentencing at that time
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Regina v Edwards (1996) 90 ACR 510 Regina v Dib NSWCCA 13 Sep. 1991 CASES CITED : R v MJR (2002) 54 NSWLR 368 AJB v R [2007] NSWCCA 51 R v Johnson NSWCCA 16 May 1997
PARTIES: BRADBERY v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3551
COUNSEL: Crown: L. Wells Applicant: A. Haesler SC
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh (Director of Public Prosecutions) S. O'Connor (Legal Aid Commission of NSW)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 07/31/0017
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: English DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 16 July 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2007/3551
MASON P LATHAM J MATHEWS AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate