NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : J F Keir Pty Ltd v Priority Management Systems Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2007] NSWSC 748
HEARING DATE(S) : 9 July 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 July 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Rein AJ
DECISION : Leave to proceed under s 440D Corporations Act 2001 granted.
CATCHWORDS : Notice of motion seeking leave to proceed against defendant company in administration pursuant to s 440D Corporations Act 2001 - Administrators appointed to defendant company part-way through hearing - Factors relevant to determination of whether Court should grant leave under s 440D
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 440D
Auburn Council v Austin Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2007] NSWSC 130 BBC Hardware Ltd v GT Homes Pty Ltd [1997] 2 Qd R 123 Complex Pty Ltd v Auslat Properties Macquarie Waters Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 435 Foxcroft v Ink Group Pty Ltd (1994) 15 ACSR 203; 12 ACLC 1063 CASES CITED : Oceanic Life Ltd v Insurance & Retirement Planning Services Pty Ltd (in liq) (1993) 2 Tas R (NC) N23; 11 ACSR 516 Ogilvie-Grant v East (1983) 7 ACLR 669; 1 ACLC 742 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 77 FCR 478; 153 ALR 626 Pioneer Water Tanks (Australia 94) Pty Ltd v Delat Pty Ltd (1997) 25 ACSR 757; 16 ACLC 36 Rowa Australia Pty Ltd v Kalamazoo Logistics Pty Ltd (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 325
PARTIES : J F Keir Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Priority Management Systems Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5042/06
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate