NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Burbidge v Wolf [2008] NSWSC 60 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 23 November 2007, 3 December 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 11 February 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Nicholas J
DECISION : Par 73
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY – outstanding professional fees – whether proceedings for recovery of costs under Legal Profession Act 1987 or for breach of trust or restitution – whether trust established – whether compliance with requirements for disclosure – compliance mandatory – whether statutory immunity established
Bankruptcy Act (Cth) 1966 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Regulation 2002
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Conder v Silkbard [1999] NSWCA 459 Coshott v Lenin [2007] NSWCA 153 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22 Koutsourais v Metledge & Associates [2004] NSWCA 313 CASES CITED : Kelly v Hogan [2004] NSWSC 238 Rahnam Investments Pty Ltd v Esplin [2004] NSWSC 529 Wentworth v Rogers [2002] NSWSC 709 Wentworth v Rogers [2006] NSWCA 145; (2006) 66 NSWLR 474 Zizza v Seymour [1976] 2 NSWLR 135
PARTIES : Richard John Burbidge - plaintiff Freya Wolf - defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1343/06
COUNSEL : F Corsaro SC/A C Casselden - plaintiff M Christie/V Culkoff - defendant
SOLICITORS : Hicksons - plaintiff Steven Klinger - defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate