NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Accom Finance Pty Limited v Mars Pty Limited, Accom Finance Pty Limited v Kowalczuk [2007] NSWSC 726 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 13, 14, 15, 16 and 19 March and 16 April 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 July 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Cross-claims dismissed in both proceedings. Orders for Judicial Sale to be made when pleading amended
CATCHWORDS : Estoppel – Res Judicata – Issue estoppel – Anshun estoppel – Default judgment in action by mortgagee for possession and for money sum due under mortgages in first proceedings – Defendant sought to bring cross claim for damages under Trade Practices Act – Whether defendant estopped from bringing cross claim – Issue raised in new proceedings must be on precise issue determined in original proceedings – No estoppel - Equity – Trade Practices Act – Unconscionable conduct – Where cross-claimant gave mortgage due to fraudulent conduct of third party – Cross-claimants not in a position of special disadvantage – Lender did not have knowledge of third party's fraud – No unconscionable conduct - Contracts – Unjust contracts – Contracts Review Act – When contract "unjust" – Where borrower did not have means to repay loan – Where lender given fraudulent information about borrower's ability to repay loan – Where rates of interest unrelated to lender's risk – Where contract was a bad bargain – Contract not unjust – Whether strong possibility of default under mortgage triggering very high default rate could amount to predatory conduct – Contracts Review Act 1980 ss 7, 8, 9 - Legal Practitioners – negligence and retainer - Duties and liabilities – To client – Solicitor advising on security documents – Scope of duty – No obligation to advise client on financial sense of mortgage – No obligation to recommend client obtain financial advice – Scope of Rule 45 of the Solicitor's Practice Rules - Mortgages – Gap between higher rate and lower rate – In reality lower rate not concessional rate but expected rate
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate