NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) NSW Conv R 56-190
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Markos v O R Autor [2007] NSWSC 810
HEARING DATE(S) : 23 to 25 May, 15 June, 10 July 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 25 July 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
DECISION : Declaration made that right of way does not authorise use for fire egress complying with BCA, and final injunction granted restraining use of site of right of way for fire egress passage from proposed building. Application to extinguish or modify right of way dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY – easements - whether right of way to pass and repass permits use of servient tenement for fire egress in satisfaction of development consent - whether court should grant declaration and injunction restraining use for fire egress passage - whether right of way should be extinguished under s 89(1)(a) in anticipation of completion of building - whether right of way should be modified under s 89(1)(c) - whether court has power under s 89(1)(c) to modify right of way for benefit of dominant owner by permitting use for fire egress passage
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 89 Building Code of Australia, Section D, paras DO1, DP4, D1.7, D1.10
Alliance Economic Investment Co Ltd v Berton (1923) 92 LJ KB 750 Attorney-General v Horner (No 2) [1913] 2 Ch 140 Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064 Butler v Muddle (1995) 6 BPR 13984 Castagna v Great Wall Resources Pty Ltd [2005] 12 BPR 23,363 Celsteel Ltd v Alton House Holdings Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 204 Clifford v Hoare (1874) LR 9 CP 362 Denham Pty Ltd v Sidoti (unreported, Waddell CJ in Eq, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 2 August 1989; BC8901890) Denton v Phillpot (1990) NSW Conv R para 55-543 Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Cavacourt Pty Ltd (2000) 10 BPR 18,099 Ex parte Purcell (1982) 47 LGRA 433 Finlayson v Campbell (1997) 8 BPR 15,703 Flynn v Harte (1913) IR 322 Gallagher v Rainbow (1994) 179 CLR 624 Harris v Flower (1904) 74 LJ Ch 127 Harrison v Duke of Rutland [1893] 1 QB 142 Hoy v ALL ERton [2001] QSC 440 In re Truman, Hanbury Buxton & Co Ltd's Application [1956] 1 QB 261 Jelbert v Davis [1968] 1 WLR 589 Loclot Pty Ltd v Pullen (2003) 56 NSWLR 592 Long v Michie [2003] NSWSC 233 CASES CITED : Manly Properties Pty Ltd v Castrisos [1973] 2 NSWLR 420 Mercantile General Life Reassurance Co of Australia Ltd v Permanent Trustee of Australia Ltd (1988) 4 BPR 9534 Natva Developments Pty Ltd v McDonald Bros Pty Ltd (2004) 12 BPR 22,287 Nickerson v Barraclough [1980] Ch 325 Paine & Co Ltd v St Neot's Gas & Coke Co [1939] 3 All ER 812 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Westfield Management Ltd [2006] NSWCA 337 Pettey v Parsons [1914] 2 Ch 653 Posetti v Kosciuszko Thredbo Pty Ltd [2007] ACTSC 4 Prospect County Council v Cross (1990) 21 NSWLR 601 Re Lewis [1959] NZLR 1040 Re Mason and The Conveyancing Act (1960) 78 WN (NSW) 925 RK Roseblade & VM Roseblade and the Conveyancing Act (1964-5) NSWR 2044 Saggers v Brown (1981) 2 BPR 9329 Siple v Blow (1904) 8 OLR 547 Timpar Nominees Pty Ltd v Archer [2001] WASCA 430 Todbern v Hurstville City Council [2001] NSWLEC 145 Todrick v Western National Omnibus Co Ltd [1934] 1 Ch 561 Toomey v Scolaro's Concrete Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] VSC 279 Tujilo v Watts (2005) 12 BPR 23,257 United Land Company v Great Eastern Railway Company (1875) 10 Ch App 586 White v Grand Hotel Eastbourne Ltd [1913] 1 Ch 113 Zenere v Leate (1980) 1 BPR 9300
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate