NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave application dismissed by the High Court 17 June 2009 [2009] HCASL 147
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Preston v Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Limited [2008] NSWCA 216
HEARING DATE(S): 19, 20 & 21 August 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 October 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; McColl JA at 2; Handley AJA
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: NEW TRIAL – Jury – fresh evidence – application not within Supreme Court Act s 75A. - NEW TRIAL – fresh evidence – discovery of documents – appellant and some defendants failed to discover same documents – such default not ground for new trial – Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade distinguished – undiscovered documents not fresh evidence.
Defamation Act 1974 LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Act UCPR Pt 51 r 51
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade [1991] HCA 61, 178 CLR 134 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 McDonald v McDonald [1965] HCA 45, 113 CLR 529 CASES CITED: Myers v Elman [1940] AC 282 Orr v Holmes [1948] HCA 16, 76 CLR 632 SZFDE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 35, 232 CLR 189 Wollongong Corporation v Cowan [1955] HCA 16, 93 CLR 435
Alexander Preston - Appellant Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management P/L - 1st Respondent Terence Sean McCabe - 2nd Respondent PARTIES: Bruce Pausey - 3rd Respondent Christopher Donald Wood - 4th Respondent Michael Maher Associates P/L - 5th Respondent Michael Maher - 6th Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate