NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : DCT v Epov [2008] NSWSC 1085
HEARING DATE(S) : 15 September 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 October 2008
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison AsJ
(1) The further amended defence filed 9 May 2008 is struck out. DECISION : (2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed. (3) Liberty to the plaintiff to apply for default judgment in the registry.
CATCHWORDS : Strike out defence
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Commonwealth of Australia v Griffiths & Anor [2007] NSWCA 370 CASES CITED : DCT v Jonrich Pty Ltd (1986) 17 ART 880 FJ Bloemen Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 360 McAndrew v FCT (1956) 98 CLR 263
PARTIES : Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Plaintiff) Peter Epov (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12667/2005
C Malcolm Australian Government Solicitor (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : M Conomos Conomos & Spinak Lawyers (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE HARRISON
THURSDAY, 16 OCTOBER 2008
12667/2005 - DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v PETER EPOV
JUDGMENT (Strike out defence) 1 HER HONOUR: By notice of motion filed 2 June 2008, the plaintiff seeks an order that the further amended defence filed 9 May 2008 be struck out and that pursuant to Rule 13.1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules judgment be entered for the plaintiff. 2 The plaintiff is the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (DCT). The defendant is Peter Epov. The DCT relied on the affidavit of Peter Douglas sworn 18 April 2008 and 12 September 2008. The defendant relied on the affidavit of Marcus William Conomos sworn 16 May 2008.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate